NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION: Montresor v Astra Prestige Vehicle Service and Detailing Pty Ltd and Anor (No 2) [2005] NSWIRComm 343
APPLICANT Lorenzo Montresor
FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES: Astra Prestige Vehicle Service and Detailing Pty Ltd
SECOND RESPONDENT Alfio Merlino
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 5995 of 2004
CORAM: Boland J
CATCHWORDS: Costs - Unfair Contract - Application for costs against defaulting parties - Failure to file reply to summons - Alleged failure of respondents being properly represented in conciliation proceedings - Costs awarded on limited basis
Industrial Relations Act 1996 LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Brasington v Overton Investments Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 571 CASES CITED: Montresor v Astra Prestige Vehicle Service and Detailing Pty Ltd and Anor [2004] NSWIRComm 312
HEARING DATES: 07/18/2005; 08/31/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/23/2005
APPLICANT Mr M Walsh of counsel Solicitor: Mr D Carbone Carbone Lawyers
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr De Meyrick of counsel
JUDGMENT: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION
CORAM: Boland J
Friday 23 September 2005
Matter No IRC 5995 of 2004
LORENZO MONTRESOR v ASTRA PRESTIGE VEHICLE SERVICE AND DETAILING PTY LTD AND ANOR (NO 2)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate