NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: The Australian Workers Union, New South Wales v BlueScope Steel Limited [2005] NSWIRComm 71
APPELLANT: The Australian Workers Union, New South Wales
PARTIES: RESPONDENT: BlueScope Steel Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 1140 of 2005
CORAM: Schmidt J
Stay of dispute orders - application for urgency - balance of convenience considered - orders formulated by Commission - ex-parte proceedings- no evidence - application for stay granted - Orders 2 and 4 stayed CATCHWORDS:
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
CASES CITED: Broken Hill Chamber of Commerce and Ors v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (New South Wales Branch) and Ors (2002) 118 IR 183
HEARING DATES: 03/08/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/08/2005
APPELLANT: Mr I Taylor, counsel SOLICITORS: Maurice May Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT: Mr D Lloyd, solicitor SOLICITORS: Blake Dawson Waldron
JUDGMENT:
- 6 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: Schmidt J
DATE: 8 March 2005
MATTER NUMBER IRC 1140 OF 2005
THE AUSTRALIAN WORKERS UNION, NEW SOUTH WALES v BLUESCOPE STEEL LIMITED Application by The Australian Workers Union, New South Wales for leave to appeal and appeal against a decision of Commissioner O'Neill given on 11 February 2005 in Matter Number IRC 726 of 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate