NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: I. Notaras and K. L. Armstrong [2005] NSWIRComm 208
Applicant Ms Irene Notaras PARTIES: Respondent Ms Kelly Learne Armstrong
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 2908 of 2005
CORAM: Backman J
Application to extend time to appeal - application for leave to appeal and appeal not yet filed - applicant's explanation for delay not acceptable - principles in relation to requirement for an explanation for delay - applicable discretionary factors to be considered - no injustice arises if application not granted - inability to assess prospects of success of an appeal in the absence of an application for leave to appeal and appeal having been filed - application to extend time to appeal refused. CATCHWORDS:
Industrial Relations Act 1996 LEGISLATION CITED:
Cavacuiti v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited (2002) 122 IR 247 De Luxe Cab Company Limited (formerly known as De Luxe Red and Yellow Cabs Co-operative Trading Society Limited) v Grenside (1999) 92 IR 384 Ratnam v Cumarasamy (1965) 1 WLR 8 CASES CITED: Skelly v Proud's Jewellers Pty Limited (1994) 53 IR 3 Vilenius v Heingar (1962) 36 ALJR 200
HEARING DATES: 06/17/2005 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 06/17/2005
Applicant: Ms I. Notaras LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
Respondent: Mr M. Heath, of counsel
JUDGMENT:
- 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate