NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION : Craig Steven Dangerfield v Commissioner of Police [2003] NSWIRComm 96 APPLICANT: Craig Steven Dangerfield PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Commissioner of Police FILE NUMBER: IRC 5715 of 2002 CORAM: Staunton J CATCHWORDS : Removal of police officer - review of order - procedural fairness - whether removal was harsh, unreasonable or unjust - onus and standard of proof in review proceedings - applicant charged with offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm of person in custody - offence proven but no conviction recorded - other officers convicted of assault and not dismissed from Police Service not such as to be relevantly compared - rule in Jones v Dunkel not applicable in the circumstances of Commissioner responding to summons for production - credibility of applicant - removal not harsh, unreasonable or unjust - application dismissed. Crimes Act 1900 s 59 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 10 Police Service Act 1990 ss 173 181D 181E 181F Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 84 Burrows v Commissioner of Police, Giardini v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWIRComm 333 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Little v Commissioner of Police (No 2) (2002) 112 IR 212 Miller v NSW Commissioner of Police [2002] NSWIRComm 296 CASES CITED : R v Williams (1990) 50 ACrimR 213 Starr v Commissioner of Police [2001] NSWIRComm 226 Van Huisstede v Commissioner of Police (2000) 98 IR 57 Wang v Crestell Industries Pty Ltd (1997) 73 IR 454 Wells and the Commissioner of Police (2000) 100 IR 106 HEARING DATES: 10/30/2002; 02/17/2003; 02/18/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/04/2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate