NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Medical Tribunal
CITATION : Katelaris v Medical Board of NSW [2009] NSWMT 6 TRIBUNAL: Medical Tribunal PARTIES : Dr Andrew Katelaris Medical Board of New South Wales FILE NUMBER(S) : 40023 of 2008 CORAM: Ainslie-Wallace, DCJ - Rotenko, Dr I - Diamond, Dr M - Deveson, AO Ms A CATCHWORDS: Review of order removing name from Register - Applicant bears the onus to prove fitness LEGISLATION CITED: Medical Practice Act 1992 Exparte TZINOLIS: re the Medical Practitioners Act (1966) 67 SR 448; Zaidi v Health Care complaints Commission [2006] NSWMT 6; CASES CITED: Zaidi v Health Care complaints Commission [1996] NSWMT; Health Care Complaints Commission v Litchfield (1997) 41 NSWLR 630; Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW v Katelaris (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 702 DATES OF HEARING: 24.8.2009, 25.8.2009, 26.8.2009. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16 October 2009 LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Applicant appeared in person G Furness of Counsel for the respondent ORDERS: 1 Application dismissed.; 2 Applicant to pay the respondent's costs of the application.
JUDGMENT: THE MEDICAL TRIBUNAL OF NEW SOUTH WALES AT SYDNEY
No. 40023 of 2008
BETWEEN
Dr Andrew Katelaris Applicant Medical Board of NSW Respondent
Deputy Chair: Judge A M Ainslie-Wallace Members: Dr Irene Rotenko Dr Michael Diamond Ms Anne Deveson AO
Reasons for determination
1 The applicant seeks to review an order that his name be removed from the register of Medical Practitioners.
2 On 15 December 2005 after hearing and determining a number of complaints brought by the Health Care Complaints Commission against the applicant, a Medical Tribunal ordered that the respondent's name be removed from the register of practitioners and that he not apply for re-registration for a period of three years. For the purposes of these reasons, this will be referred to as the 2005 Medical Tribunal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate