NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Insp Benbow v Planada Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2001] NSWIRComm 299 PROSECUTION: PARTIES : Inspector Benbow DEFENDANT: Planada Holdings Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: IRC4099 of 2000 CORAM: Kavanagh J CATCHWORDS : Costs LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 HEARING DATES: 11/14/2001 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/14/2001
Prosecutor: Solicitors: Mr G. Henderson LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: PricewaterhouseCoopers Legal
Defendant: No appearance
JUDGMENT: - 2 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION CORAM: KAVANAGH J Date : Wed 14 November 2001
IRC4099 of 2000 INSPECTOR ELIZABETH BENBOW v PLANADA HOLDINGS PTY LTD Prosecution under s15(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT [2001] NSWIRComm299
1 The Prosecutor makes application under Part 20 rule151(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 for the court to amend paragraph 35 of its judgment in Insp Benbow v Planada Holdings Pty Ltd [2001]NSWIRComm275 (2 November 2001). Part 20 Rule 151(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 states: 151(1) Where there is a mistake in an order or decision, arising from an accidental slip or omission, a tribunal, on application by any party or of its own motion, may at any time correct the mistake or error.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate