NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Peter Leo Smith and D.M. Roberts & Company, Solicitors [2005] NSWIRComm 1007
APPLICANT Peter Leo Smith PARTIES: RESPONDENT Beverley Boyle
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 2312 of 2004
CORAM: Tabbaa C
CATCHWORDS: Failure to prosecute case expeditiously - failure to mitigate losses - applicant's case had little prospect of success - vexatious claim
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
HEARING DATES: 05/31/2004; 09/13/2004
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/04/2005
Applicant appeared in person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Beverley Boyle, Solicitor
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: TABBAA, C.
4 January 2005
Matter No IRC 2312 of 2004
PETER LEO SMITH and D.M. ROBERTS & COMPANY, Solicitors.
Application by P. Smith re: unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996. DECISION
[2005] NSWIRComm 1007
1 Mr. Peter Leo Smith (the applicant) filed a claim under Section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996 on 16 April, 2004 alleging that the respondent had unfairly dismissed him on 15 April, 2004. The applicant contended that he had been employed from 10 July, 2000 until his dismissal as a Litigation Lawyer.
2 The file was allocated on the same day and was set down for conference and directions on 31 May, 2004 at which time the following appearances were entered:
Mr. P. Smith Applicant, on his own behalf
Mrs. B. Boyle Sole Practitioner, on behalf of the Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate