NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : (Re Mowbray) Brambles Australia Ltd v British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd [2006] NSWDDT 15 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
PARTIES : Brambles Australia Ltd (formerly known as Brambles Holdings Ltd) British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 176/2001/1
JUDGMENT OF: Curtis J at 1
CATCHWORDS: Dust Diseases Tribunal :- Orders for further Discovery Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946, s5(1)(c) LEGISLATION CITED: Trade Practices Act 1974, s75AE Supreme Court Rules, Prt 23 r3 Evidence Act 1995, ss 75, 118, 119, 125
Attorney-General for Northern Territory (1985) 158 CLR 500; Telstra v Australis Media Holdings (1997) 41 NSWLR 346; Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49; Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2001] NSWSC 222; Kang v Kwan [2001] NSWSC 698; CASES CITED: ATH Transport v JAS (International) [2002] NSWSC 956; United States of America v Phillip Morris USA Inc; Bray v F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd [2002] FCA 243; Commissioner of Federal Police v Propend (1996-1997) 188 CLR 501; Reg v Bell; Ex parte Lees (1980) 146 CLR 141; McCabe v British American Tobacco Services Australia Ltd [2002] VSC 73; British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Cowell (2002) 7 VR 524
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate