NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION : Lenard and Jay and Kay Safety Glass Pty Ltd No 2 [2004] NSWIRComm 177 APPLICANT: PARTIES : Peter Raymond Lenard RESPONDENT: Jay and Kay Safety Glass Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: 106 of 2003 CORAM: Sams DP Termination of employment - unfair dismissal - earlier interlocutory proceedings - respondent's failure to attend or provide evidence - respondent's failure to provide any explanation for his conduct - Rules of the Commission. CATCHWORDS : Held, matter determined ex parte - respondent's conduct reprehensible - uncontested evidence accepted - dismissal harsh, unreasonable and unjust both substantively and procedurally - reinstatement impractical - compensation ordered - orders made. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 Industrial Relations Commission Rules CASES CITED : Hellouli v Computer Express Group Pty Limited (unreported, Connor, C, IRC04/3343, 25 February 2004) Lenard and Jay and Kay Safety Glass [2003] NSWIRComm 305 HEARING DATES: 04/27/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/25/2004
APPLICANT: Mr Peter Raymond Lenard LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: No appearance
JUDGMENT: - 5 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES CORAM: SAMS DP 25 June 2004 Matter No IRC03/106 Peter Raymond Lenard and Jay and Kay Safety Glass Pty Ltd Application by Peter Raymond Lenard re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 DECISION [2004] NSWIRComm 177
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate