NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : Amaca Pty Ltd v CSR Limited [2008] NSWDDT 18
Amaca Pty Ltd (Cross Claimant) PARTIES : CSR Limited (First Cross Defendant) Midalco Pty Limited (Second Cross Defendant)
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 238 of 2001/1
JUDGMENT OF: Curtis J at 1
CATCHWORDS: DUST DISEASES TRIBUNAL :- Cross Claims - Foreseeability - Duty of care - Causation
LEGISLATION CITED: Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946
Rose v Abbey Orchard Property Investments Pty Ltd (1987) Aust Torts Reports 80-121 Rentz v Seltsam Pty Ltd [2004] NSWDDT 15 EM Baldwin & Son Pty Ltd v Plane (1998) 17 NSWCCR 434 EMI (Australia) Ltd v BES [1970] 2 NSWR 238 Chapman v Hearse (1961) 106 CLR 112 Bolton v Stone [1951] AC 850 CASES CITED: CSR Ltd v Young (1998) 16 NSWCCR 56 Bale v Seltsam Pty Ltd (QLDCA, No 284/95 23 August 1995 unreported) Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 52 Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 Sullivan v Gordon (1999) 47 NSWLR 319 CSR Ltd v Eddy (2005) 226 CLR 1 Griffiths v Kerkemeyer (1977) 139 CLR 161
DATES OF HEARING: 31/3/08, 1-3/4/08, 2/6/08/, 5/6/08
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25 June 2008
Mr G M Watson SC with Mr J C Sheller instructed by DLA Phillips Fox appeared for the cross claimant LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr B W Walker SC with Ms J Gleeson instructed by Makinson and d'Apice appeared for the cross defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate