NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Romanin v University Co-operative Bookshop Limited [2003] NSWIRComm 326 FRANK ROMANIN Applicant PARTIES : UNIVERSITY CO-OPERATIVE BOOKSHOP LIMITED Respondent FILE NUMBER: IRC 2567 of 2000 CORAM: Schmidt J CATCHWORDS : Unfair contract - notice of motion seeking leave for applicant to call evidence in reply to evidence given by respondent's witness in cross examination - leave sought granted LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 HEARING DATES: 09/19/2003 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 09/19/2003
APPLICANT: Mr R Alkadamani of counsel SOLICITORS: Haywards LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Ms C Ronalds of counsel SOLICITORS:
JUDGMENT: - 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION
CORAM: Schmidt J
DATE: 19 September 2003
Matter Number IRC 2567 of 2000 FRANK ROMANIN v UNIVERSITY CO-OPERATIVE BOOKSHOP LIMITED Application under section 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 JUDGMENT (extempore)
1 HER HONOUR: This judgment deals with a motion seeking leave for the applicant to call evidence in reply in relation to evidence given by one of the respondent's witnesses in cross examination.
2 The respondent opposes that leave being granted, submitting that the evidence in question does not go to a fact in issue in the proceedings but rather only to credit, and a collateral issue. Section 102 of the Evidence Act 1995 is also relied on.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate