NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Holland v. NSK Services Pty Limited [2005] NSWIRComm 1084
APPLICANT Mandy Holland
PARTIES: RESPONDENT NSK Services Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S): 4456 of 2004
CORAM: Connor C
termination of employment - unfair dismissal - delay in proceedings - pressure from a third party to terminate an employee's services - the "fair go all round" concept - lack of evidence to support an allegation of misconduct - impracticability of reinstatement - monetary compensation - transmission of business CATCHWORDS:
Industrial Relations Act 1996 LEGISLATION CITED:
Bateman v. Royal Alexandra for Children (unreported) Bonnici v. Wormald Security (unreported) Bostik (Australia)Pty Limited v. Gorgevski (No.1) (1992) 36 FLR 20 Busways v. Johnson (1994) 55 IR 255 Burge v. BHP Steel Pty Limited (2001) 105 IR 325 D and R Commercial Pty Limited v. Flood (2002) 113 IR 344 Hollingsworth v. Commissioner of Police (No.2) 88 IR 282 Little v. Commissioner of Police (No.2) (2002) 112 IR 212 CASES CITED: Re Loty and Holloway and the Australian Workers' Union (1971) AR 95 Macleay Valley Health Service v. Jeffree (1994) 58 IR 187 McCarthy v. Northern Territory Prestressing Pty Limited (unreported) Oswald v. New South Wales Police Service Outboard World Pty Limited v. Muir (1993) 51 IR 167 Parker v. Capital Painters Pty Limited (1996) 68 IR 100 Perkins v. Grace Worldwide (Australia) Pty Limited (1997) 72 IR 186
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate