NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Hardy v Gase [2000] NSWIRComm 139 APPLICANT: PARTIES : Ian Hardy RESPONDENT: Judith Gase FILE NUMBER: IRC 2246 of 2000 CORAM: Boland J LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 CASES CITED : Gase v Hardy [2000] NSWIRComm 125 HEARING DATES: 06/13/2000; 06/16/2000; 07/04/2000; 07/05/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/02/2000
APPLICANT: Mr P Newall of Counsel Solicitor - Ms M Hole Wm. Walker Taylor Edwards & Smith LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr M Lawler of Counsel Solicitor - Mr P Thompson Thompson Eslick
JUDGMENT: - 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION
CORAM: BOLAND J
DATE: 2 AUGUST 2000
Matter No IRC 2246 of 2000 IAN CEDRIC HARDY v JUDITH MARI GASE Application under s.106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 JUDGEMENT
1 On 23 May 2000 Ian Cedric Hardy filed a Summons for Relief under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 ("the Act") in Matter No. 2246 of 2000. The Summons was, in effect, a counter-claim against an application under s 106 of the Act by Judith Marie Gase in Matter No. 1031 of 2000. It was agreed between the parties that the application by Ian Hardy and the one filed by Ms Gase should be joined and that the evidence in relation to Ms Gase's Summons should be the evidence in Matter No. 2246 of 2000. I agreed to this approach.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate