NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : (re Millard) Energy Australia and Anor v Power Technologies Pty Ltd [2008] NSWDDT 11
PARTIES : Energy Australia (Cross-Claimant to the first Cross-Claim) Eraring Energy (Cross-Claimant to the second Cross-Claim)
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 6124/2006/1; 6124/2006/2
JUDGMENT OF: O'Meally P
CATCHWORDS: DUST DISEASES TRIBUNAL :- cross claim - application to set down for hearing
LEGISLATION CITED: Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2007
DATES OF HEARING: 15 April 2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15 April 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 15 April 2008
J C Sheller instructed by Goldrick Farrell Mullan appeared for the Cross-Claimants LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: T M Rowles instructed by Carroll & O'Dea appeared for the Cross-Defendant
JUDGMENT:
RULING O'MEALLY P 1. Yesterday these cross-claims were listed in the usual Monday interlocutory list to deal with a notice of motion filed on 13 March 2008. It is surprising that the matters were brought before the Court by way of notice of motion, but seemingly that was a result of agreement between the cross-claimants and the cross-defendant.
2. The circumstances of the cross-claims were adverted to in the decision in (Re Millard) Eraring Energy and Anor v Power Technologies [2007] NSW DDT 24. That was a notice of motion brought by the cross-claimants seeking orders pursuant to s 90 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 that Power Technologies Pty Ltd (Power Technologies), the cross-defendant to each of the cross-claims, pay sums of money together with interest to the cross-claimants. The amounts of money were paid. They represented percentages assessed by a contributions assessor as contributions which should be made to a judgment obtained by the plaintiff. When it was indicated yesterday that cross-claims should be listed for hearing, Mr Sheller of counsel who appears for the cross-claimants, asked that reasons for that order be given. I was not in a position to deal with his request yesterday by reason of the state of the list, and the matter was stood over until today.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate