NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION : Massoud v SITEL Corporation Australia Pty. Limited [2001] NSWIRComm 218 PARTIES : Mary-Rose Massoud v SITEL Corporation Australia Pty. Limited FILE NUMBER: 2915 of 2000 CORAM: Grayson DP Termination of employment - serious and wilful misconduct - knowing invovlement in receipt of embezzled funds - ex post facto reasons - accessing and sending sexually explicit material - improper use of employer telecommunication system - knowledge of meaning and intent of respondent policy if not specific details - procedural fairness CATCHWORDS : Held, allegation of knowing invovlement in receipt of embezzled funds not proved to reasonable satisfaction of tribunal - ex post facto reasons for dismissal estabilshed to the required standard - dismissal not harsh, unreasonable or unjust - intervention not warranted - application dismissed. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 Western Suburbs District Ambulance Committee v Tipping [1957] AR (NSW) 273 Bigg v NSW Police Service (1998) 80 IR 434 Barrett v Crown Street Women's Hospital [1947] AR (NSW) 565 Pastrycooks Employees, Biscuit Makers Employees and Flour and Sugar Goods Workers Union v Gartrell White [No.3] (1990) 35 IR 70 Raap v Wauchope RSL Club Ltd (1995) 81 IR 116 Re Municipal Employees, Greater Newcastle (Wages Division) Award (Re Wallace) [1949] AR (NSW) 868 Homebush Abbatoir [1966] AR (NSW) 386 WD & HO Wills (Australia) Ltd v Jamieson [1957] AR (NSW) 547 North v Television Corporation Ltd [1976] 11 ALR 599 CASES CITED : Flynn v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1982) 3 IR 413 Williams v Printers Trade Services (1984) 7 IR 82 Wallace v Deering Auto Electrics (1985) 12 IR 34 Wang v Crestell Industries Pty Ltd (1997) 73 IR 454 Bringinshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees' Association, NSW Branch v Jewel Food Stores (1987) 22 IR 1 Coles Myer Ltd v Shop, Distributive & Allied Employees Association (NSW) (1989) 27 IR 299 Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 Lane v Arrowcrest Group t/as Roh Alloy Wheels (1990) 27 FCR 427 Bi-Lo Pty Ltd v Hooper (1992) 53 IR 224 M v M (1988) 63 ALJR 108 HEARING DATES: 04/18/2001; 04/19/2001; 04/20/2001; 06/05/2001; 06/06/2001; 06/26/2001; 08/21/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/21/2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate