NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Rodney Morrison v Tahmoor Coal Pty Ltd. Prosecution under s 15(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 [2002] NSWIRComm 327 PROSECUTOR: Rodney Morrison PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Tahmoor Coal Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: IRC No 4867 of of 2001 CORAM: Haylen J Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - s 15(1) - employee drowned - no witness to events immediately beforehand - prosecution case focusses on accident - identified risk is risk of drowning - no act or omission of the employer causally connected to the identified risk - system of work and safety measures identified - summons dismissed. CATCHWORDS : Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 - s 33 s 39 - associated safety legislation permits adequately trained employee to work unaccompanied when working underground in a mine - authorised employee drowns - no offence under s 15(1) if act or omission expressly permitted under associated legislation.
Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 s 15(1) s 33 s 39 s 53 LEGISLATION CITED : Coal Mines Regulation Act 1982 s 93D Coal Mines (General) Regulations 1984 Clause 11(1) Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1983-1984) 153 CLR 521 at 536 Drake Personnel Ltd t/as Drake Industrial v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Ch'ng) (1999) 90 IR 432 at 452 Dunlop Rubber Australia Ltd v Buckley (1952) 87 CLR 313 at 320 Haynes v C I & D Manufacturing Pty Ltd (1995) 60 IR 149 at 155 to 157 CASES CITED : Inspector Barnard v Rail Infrastructure Corporation (2001) NSWIRComm 255 at 45 (para [10] Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sproules (2001) 52 NSWLR 705) WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Bultitude) v Grice Constructions Pty Ltd (2002) 115 IR 59 at 77 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Glass) v Kellogg (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 1) (2000) 101 IR 239 at 258 Workcover Authority of New Sputh Wales (Inspector Martin) v GrainCorp Operations Limited [2002] NSWIRComm 312 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Twynam-Perkins) v Maine Lighting Pty Ltd (1995) 100 IR 248 at 257 HEARING DATES: 09/30/2002; 10/01/2002; 10/02/2002; 10/03/2002; 11/01/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/03/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate