NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : Todd v Bluescope Steel (AIS) Pty Limited [2006] NSWDDT 33
PARTIES : George Todd (Plaintiff) Bluescope Steel (AIS) Pty Limited (formerly BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Limited) (Defendant)
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 6140/06
JUDGMENT OF: Kearns J
Dust Diseases Tribunal :- asbestosis divisibility of asbestosis exposure with defendant and earlier exposure CATCHWORDS: assessment of relative exposures life expectancy general damages damages pursuant to Griffiths v Kirkemeyer and Sullivan v Gordon and consideration of s15B of Civil Liability Act.
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Act 2002
Griffiths v Kirkemeyer (1977) 139 CLR 161 ; CASES CITED: Sullivan v Gordon (1999) 47 NSWLR 319; Werner v Krahe [2002] NSWCA 168
DATES OF HEARING: 16/08/06, 17/08/06, 11/09/06, 12/09/06, 20/09/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/20/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 09/20/2006
Mr D G Letcher, QC instructed by Turner Freeman appeared for the Plaintiff LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr T M Rowles instructed by Sparke Helmore appeared for the Defendant
JUDGMENT: KEARNS J
Outline 1. The plaintiff has asbestosis. That much is conceded by the defendant. The plaintiff seeks damages for this illness.
2. Asbestosis is a divisible disease. What that means in the context of this case is that the defendant is not liable for the whole of the damage suffered by the plaintiff as a result of his exposure to asbestos, but is liable only to the extent of the damage occasioned as a result of his exposure to asbestos whilst in the employ of the defendant. This has a significance because before the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos in the employ of the defendant, he had an earlier period of exposure when he worked at a shipyard in Belfast for Harland & Wolff (the shipyard exposure).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate