NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : (Re McDonald) Amaca Pty Ltd v CSR Ltd [2007] NSWDDT 25
PARTIES : Amaca Pty Ltd (Cross-Claimant) CSR Ltd (Cross-Defendant)
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 85/91/1; 90/91/1 of
JUDGMENT OF: O'Meally P
CATCHWORDS: Dust Diseases Tribunal :- Cross Claim - Partnership - Plaintiff alleged exposure to asbestos from partnership products - Partner defends plaintiff's action - Verdict for partner - Claim by partner for contribution by other partner to costs of defending plaintiff's action - Whether Partnership Deed gives rise to liability to contribute to costs - Partnership dissolved - Whether Deed of Dissolution releases other partner from liability to contribute - Whether absence of good faith in defence of plaintiff's action - Whether costs unreasonably incurred - Whether Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear cross claim - Whether payment of costs under Policy of Insurance to be taken into account
Compensation To Relatives Act 1897 LEGISLATION CITED: Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989
CSR Ltd v Wren (1997) 44 NSWLR 463; (1997) 15 NSWCCR 650; CSR Ltd v Amaca Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 107; Amaca Pty Limited, formerly known as James Hardie and Coy Pty Limited v CSR Limited [2001] NSWSC 324; (Re: Jones-Mashman) Amaca Pty Ltd v CSR Ltd [2007] NSWDDT 17; CASES CITED: William John Lovegrove v Greenleaf Pty Limited and Ors (DDT 61 of 1992, 20 December 1992, unreported); Anderson v Kaufman (1991) 7 NSWCCR 198; Morgan Equipment Co v Rodgers (1993) 32 NSWLR 467; Albion Insurance Company Limited v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1969) 121 CLR 342; QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Wallaby Grip Ltd and Ors [2007] NSWCA 43
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate