NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Frederick Fliedner v Philips Electronics Australia Ltd [2003] NSWIRComm 23 APPLICANT Frederick Fliedner PARTIES : RESPONDENT Philips Electronics Australia Ltd FILE NUMBER: IRC 3132 of 2001 CORAM: Marks J CATCHWORDS : Unfair contract - Applicant alleged that imposition of cap on retrenchment benefits rendered the contract unfair - Held that in the absence of any evidence or information about any community standard of payment of retrenchment benefits unable to find that the retrenchment cap was unfair - Held that failure to take into account car allowance and bonus in calculation of retrenchment benefits rendered the contract unfair - Orders accordingly. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 Baker v National Distribution Services Ltd (1993) 50 IR 254 CASES CITED : Westfield v Adams (2001) NSWIRComm 293 Westfield Holdings v Adams (2002) 114 IR 241 Payne v Foxboro (1998) 81 IR 404 HEARING DATES: 12/17/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/18/2003
APPLICANT Mr I Latham of counsel SOLICITORS Beston Macken McManis LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr B J A Shields of counsel SOLICITORS Deacons
JUDGMENT: - 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION CORAM: MARKS J Tuesday 18 February 2003 Matter No IRC 3132 of 2001 FREDERICK FLIEDNER v PHILIPS ELECTRONICS AUSTRALIA LTD Application under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate