NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : (re Stavar) Amaca Pty Ltd v CSR Ltd [2008] NSWDDT 29
PARTIES : Amaca Pty Ltd (Cross-Claimant) CSR Ltd (Cross-Defendant)
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 7349/07/2
JUDGMENT OF: O'Meally P
CATCHWORDS: DUST DISEASES TRIBUNAL :- Plaintiff recovers damages - Cross-claim - Contributions determination - Whether cross-claimant entitled to verdict and judgment in accordance with contributions determination
CASES CITED: QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited v Wallaby Grip Limited and Ors [2007] NSWCA 43
DATES OF HEARING: 1 October 2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 1 October 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 1 October 2008
J C Sheller instructed by DLA Phillips Fox appeared for the Cross-Claimant LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: W P Y Austron instructed by Leigh Virtue & Associates appeared for the Cross-Defendant
JUDGMENT:
RULING O'MEALLY P 1. Amaca Pty Limited (Amaca) seeks an order that CSR Limited (CSR) pay to it 6.35 per cent of $339,000. 6.35 per cent is the proportion determined by a contributions assessor as that which CSR should contribute to the plaintiff's damages. The application is resisted by Mr Austron for CSR solely on the basis that it is premature. He says that in light of the findings made in the plaintiff's proceedings, it is inevitable that there will be disputes between the defendants on the amounts or percentages each should contribute to the plaintiff's damages and in due course these disputes will require determination by the Tribunal.
2. That is as well may be, but the Regulation has produced some peculiar consequences, some of which were referred to by Handley A-JA in QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited v Wallaby Grip Limited and Ors [2007] NSWCA 43.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate