NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Zey v Almondo Pty Ltd [2005] NSWIRComm 1083
Applicant : Ms. Eedra Zey PARTIES: Respondent: Almondo Pty Ltd.
FILE NUMBER(S): 5143 of 2004
CORAM: Ritchie C
Application for unfair dismissal. Applicant an employee of a two person company. Other employee the director an sole owner of company. Applicant and director in a de facto relationship. Applicant carried out admin. work for the company and superannuation company. CATCHWORDS: Applicant terminated when de facto relationship broke down. Tax minimisation scheme set up to benefit both parties. Commission found that parties had not set out to establish a true employer/employee relationship. Once de facto relationship broke down ,employer/employee relationship could not survive. Commission found that in these particular circumstances the termination was neither harsh, unjust or unreasonable.
Industrial Relations Act LEGISLATION CITED: 1996
CASES CITED: Bradley v Bradley 1978 AR 94.
HEARING DATES: 05/12/2005 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 06/03/2005
Applicant was self represented. LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr.J. Lynch,solicitor of Barkus Edwards Doolan
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate