NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Papaioannou -v- Singh [2004] NSWIRComm 1117 APPLICANT PARTIES: Maria Papaioannou RESPONDENT Tejinder Singh FILE NUMBER: IRC 2464 of 2004 CORAM: Cambridge C CATCHWORDS: Unfair Dismissal - Termination of Employment - redundancy alleged as reason for dismissal - reason for dismissal found to be false - basis for dismissal held to be improper - procedural errors in addition to false substantive basis - employer's conduct reprehensible - dismissal found to be harsh, unreasonable and unjust - compensation ordered LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 HEARING DATES: 07/29/2004; 09/06/2004 DECISION DATE: 11/02/2004 APPLICANT Mr C Magee
REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Respondent appeared in person
DECISION: INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE
2 November 2004
Matter No IRC 2464 of 2004
Maria Papaioannou -V- Tejinder Singh
Application by M Papaioannou re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 re alleged unfair dismissal.
DECISION
[2004] NSWIRComm 1117
1 On 23 April 2004, Maria Papaioannou, (the applicant), made a claim for Relief in relation to unfair dismissal. The claim was made by application taken pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 [NSW], (the Act). The application named the respondent employer as Tejinder Singh (the employer). The respondent employer was also referred to as Tejinder Singh trading as AK Blockbuster (ACN 091 295 322).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate