NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Cavacuitti & Anor v XTMCA Ltd (Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Pty Ltd) No 2 [2002] NSWIRComm 224 FIRST APPLICANT PARTIES : Anthony Andrew Cavacuitti SECOND APPLICANT Berridale Investments Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: IRC 666 of 1999 CORAM: Marks J CATCHWORDS : Rejection by applicants of costs - Offer of compromise - Proceedings dismissed - Respondent not entitled to order for indemnity costs but entitled to costs as assessed. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 Legal Profession Act CASES CITED : Hairman v FileNET Corporation Pty Ltd (2002) NSWIRComm 76 HEARING DATES: 08/28/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/08/2002
APPLICANTS Mr J S Van Aalst of counsel SOLICITORS Gates Moffitt LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT SOLICITORS Mr C Barton Freehills
JUDGMENT:
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION CORAM: MARKS J Tuesday 8 October 2002 Matter No IRC 666 of 1999 ANTHONY ANDREW CAVACUITTI & ANOR v XTMCA LTD (TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION AUSTRALIA LTD).
Application under s106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
JUDGMENT RE COSTS
1 On 5 June 2002 I published a judgment in these proceedings in which I dismissed an application by the first and second applicants against the respondent for relief under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996. Costs were reserved and this judgment deals with the issue of costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate