NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Finemore AO v Resarta Pty Ltd & Ors [2002] NSWIRComm 143 APPLICANT Ronald Stanley Finemore AO
RESPONDENTS First Respondent Resarta Pty Limited PARTIES : Second Respondent Toll (FHL) Limited formerly called Finemore Holdings Limited
Third Respondent Toll Holdings Limited
FILE NUMBER: IRC 7532 of 2001 CORAM: Marks J CATCHWORDS : s 106 proceedings - Concurrent proceedings involving same parties in Supreme Court of Victoria - Application by respondents for s 106 proceedings to be cross-vested to Supreme Court of New South Wales and thence to Supreme Court of Victoria - Application by respondents to stay s 106 proceedings - Stay refused - Application by respondents to stay interlocutory proceedings concerning whether certain documents be subject of privilege - Stay refused. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Victoria) HEARING DATES: 05/21/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/26/2002
APPLICANT Mr J J E Fernon of counsel SOLICITORS Atanaskovic Hartnell
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS Mr R F Crow of counsel SOLICITORS Clayton Utz, Melbourne Victoria
JUDGMENT:
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION CORAM: MARKS J Wednesday 26 June 2002 Matter No IRC 7532 of 2001 RONALD FINEMORE AO v RESARTA PY LTD & ORS Application under s106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate