NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION : Kalotina Kremiss and Vince Perry t/as Sydney Property Management Specialists [2002] NSWIRComm 204 APPLICANT: PARTIES : Kalotina Kremiss RESPONDENT: Vince Perry t/as Sydney Property Management Specialists FILE NUMBER: 462 of 2002 CORAM: Sams DP Termination of employment - unfair dismissal - conduct of proceedings - Commission's rules - Rule 146 and 147 - failure to comply with directions - failure to attend proceedings - want of prosecution - principles considered. CATCHWORDS : Held, no explanation for non attendance at proceedings - application not pursued with due diligence - Rules 146 and 147 - application dismissed for want of prosecution. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 Hutchison and Karl Azzi Hairstylists [2002] NSWIRComm 133 CASES CITED : The Spanish Club Limited v Australian Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers Union, New South Wales Branch, 87 IR 294 Xiu Zhen Lin and Roseville Golf Club Limited [2002] NSWIRComm 81 HEARING DATES: 07/16/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/19/2002
APPLICANT: No appearance LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr V Perry
JUDGMENT: - 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: SAMS DP 15 August 2002
Matter No IRC02/462
KALOTINA KREMISS AND VINCE PERRY t/as SYDNEY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS
Application by Kalotina Kremiss re unfair dismissal pursuant to section 84 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate