NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Robert Edmond Coghill v TechniCall Australia Limited & Ors [2000] NSWIRComm 141 APPLICANT: Robert Edmond Coghill FIRST RESPONDENT: TechniCall Australia Limited PARTIES : SECOND RESPONDENT: Robert William Moore THIRD RESPONDENT: Nathan Spatt FOURTH RESPONDENT: Capital Credit Company Pty Limited FILE NUMBER: IRC2087 of 1998 CORAM: Kavanagh J CATCHWORDS : Claim under s106 pleading unfair contract - a failed business venture - applicant a shareholder in business - applicant held a number of agreements with the corporation for the various roles he fulfilled - the promise of an employment contract - whether some payments made were unfair - at the termination of contract of employment whether in its performance there was an unfairness - consideration as to a shareholder of the company and his "connection with" the employment contract - consideration as to shareholder's company's "connection with" the employment contract - not sufficient "connection with" the employment contract to justify orders against either respondent. Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 106 LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1991 s275 Industrial Arbitration Act 1940 s88F Bankruptcy Act 1966 Port Macquarie Golf Club Limited v Stead & Anor (1995-1996) 64 IR 53 Re Herrick v Star Carrying Company Pty Limited & Ors (1968) 68 AR 445 CASES CITED : Brown & Ors v Rezitis & Ors (1971) 127 CLR 157 TNT Management Pty Limited & Anor v White & Ors (1984) 7 IR 331 Kinsella v Trustees of Camperdown Cemetery Trust (1998) 43 NSWLR 376 HEARING DATES: 03/20/2000; 03/21/2000; 03/22/2000; 03/23/2000 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/15/2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate