NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Local Government (Electricians) State Award [2005] NSWIRComm 176
Electrical Trades Union of Australia, NSW Branch PARTIES: NSW Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines & Utilities Union Local Government and Shires' Association of New South Wales
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 2410 of 2005
CORAM: Harrison DP
CATCHWORDS: Application for variation re clause 39 Superannuation - variation required to comply with changes to superannuation legislation - provision for salary sacrifice for superannuation purposes - Award varied
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
HEARING DATES: 05/19/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/30/2005
APPLICANT Mr S Robinson (ETU) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr R Nassif (LGSA)
JUDGMENT:
- 2 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: HARRISON DP
30 May 2005
Matter No IRC 2410 of 2005
LOCAL GOVERNMENT (ELECTRICIANS) STATE AWARD
Application by the Electrical Trades Union of Australia, NSW Branch for variation re clause 39 Superannuation
DECISION
[2005] NSWIRComm 176
1 This is an application filed on 12 May 2005 by the Electrical Trades Union of Australia, New South Wales Branch ('ETU') for variation to cl 39, Superannuation of the Local Government (Electricians) State Award ("the Award") 317 IG 519. 2 The matter was subject to hearing on 19 May 2005. 3 Mr S Robinson appeared on behalf of the ETU. Mr R Nassif appeared on behalf of the Local Government and Shires Association of New South Wales (LGSA) and the New South Wales Local Government, Clerical, Administrative, Energy, Airlines & Utilites Union (USU). 4 Mr Robinson submitted that the ETU sought variations to the Award, as detailed in the application, which are required to comply with changes to superannuation legislation commencing July 1 2005 and to allow for salary sacrifice for superannuation purposes. 5 The application was amended by consent in terms of Exhibit 1 which corrected the arrangement of the variation within the award without altering the substance of the application. 6 Mr Nassif concurred with the submission of Mr Robinson and expressed the consent of the respondents to variation of the award in the terms sought. 7 I am satisfied that the variation subject to hearing in this matter meets the requirements of the legislation and the Award is appropriately varied by consent of the parties as amended by Exhibit 1 with effect from 19 May 2005. oo0oo
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate