NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Brigitte Lipman and anor v AG Lifestyle Management Pty Limited and anor [2002] NSWIRComm 188 BRIGITTE LIPMAN First Applicant
GARY CECIL LIPMAN Second Respondent PARTIES : AG LIFESTYLE MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED (ACN 002 857 187) First Respondent
AMANDA GORE Second Respondent FILE NUMBER: IRC 3967 of 2000 CORAM: Schmidt J CATCHWORDS : Practice and Procedure - interlocutory judgment - 'no case to answer' application - relief from obligation to make an election as to evidence sought - applicants' case closed - no warrant for departure from general rule in Davis v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited (1998) 364 - respondents' application refused LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 Davis v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited (1998) 81 IR 364 CASES CITED : Garde v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [1992] NSWIRC 21 (10 July 1992)
HEARING DATES: 08/01/2002 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 08/01/2002
APPLICANTS: Ms KT Nomchong of counsel SOLICITORS: Shanahan Tudhope LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS: Mr AR Moses of counsel SOLICITORS: Tress Cocks & Maddox
JUDGMENT: - 1 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate