NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : (re McDonald) Amaca Pty Ltd v CSR Ltd (No 2) [2007] NSWDDT 31
PARTIES : Amaca Pty Ltd (Cross-Claimant) CSR Ltd (Cross-Defendant)
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 85/91/1; 90/91/1 of
JUDGMENT OF: O'Meally P
CATCHWORDS: Dust Diseases Tribunal :- Cross-Claim - Judgment for Cross-Claimant - Delay in prosecuting Cross-Claim - Claim for interest - Whether delay should reduce interest
CASES CITED: Kalls Enterprises Pty Ltd (in liquidation) & Ors v Baloglow and Anor (No 3) [2007] NSWCA 298; John Fairfax and Sons Ltd v Kelly (31 March 1987, unreported, BC8701464)
DATES OF HEARING: 11 December 2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11 December 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11 December 2007
Mr J C Sheller instructed by Holman Webb appeared for the Cross-Claimant LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr F Corsaro, SC instructed by Toomey Pegg Drevikovsky appeared for the Cross-Defendant
JUDGMENT:
O'MEALLY P 1. On 14 September 2007 reasons were delivered in these cross-claims. It was declared that Amaca Pty Ltd (Amaca) was entitled to judgment and the parties were directed to bring in short minutes specifying the amount to be paid to Amaca, taking into account the opinion that the cost of bringing two witnesses from the United States to give evidence in the plaintiff's action should not be allowed. The parties have not yet handed up short minutes, but today I am required to arbitrate upon a claim for interest. It has now been agreed, however, that in each of the two cross-claims the judgment amount is $129,554.08. What remains in dispute is the amount of interest claimed by Amaca on the judgment sum in each of the two cases.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate