NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales
CITATION : Phillips v Amaca Pty Ltd [2010] NSWDDT 11
PARTIES : Vivienne Mae Phillips (Plaintiff) Amaca Pty Ltd (Defendant)
MATTER NUMBER(S) : 375 of 2009
JUDGMENT OF: O'Meally P
CATCHWORDS: DUST DISEASES TRIBUNAL :- mesothelioma - general damages - loss of earning capacity
CASES CITED: Griffiths v Kerkemeyer (1977) 139 CLR 161 Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638
DATES OF HEARING: 20 July 2010, 21 July 2010, 27 July 2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27 July 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 27 July 2010
P C B Semmler, QC with S Tzouganatos instructed by Turner Freeman appeared for the Plaintiff LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: G F Little, SC instructed by Ellison Tillyard Callanan appeared for the Defendant
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT O'MEALLY P 1. Vivienne Mae Phillips (the plaintiff) has contracted the fatal disease of malignant mesothelioma, as a result of inhaling asbestos dust and fibre released from products manufactured by James Hardie & Company Pty Ltd in whose shoes Amaca Pty Ltd (the defendant) now stands. Its liability to compensate the plaintiff has been admitted and my task is to assess the damages to which she is entitled. The Plaintiff 2. The plaintiff was born on 7 July 1950 and hence is now sixty years of age. She was married for the second time in June 1995 and of her first marriage she has three adult children. She left school in 1968 and thereafter engaged in a variety of employments and undertook a variety of tertiary courses. She has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Behavioural Science from the University of Southern Queensland which she attended between 1989 and 1992. She also obtained a bachelor's degree in Applied Science and Applied Psychology, though she has not practised as a clinical psychologist.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate