NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Darc Rasmussen v Eltrax Systems Pty Ltd [2004] NSWIRComm 307 APPLICANT Darc Rasmussen
FIRST RESPONDENT Eltrax Systems Pty Ltd (Formerly Sulcus (Australia) Pty Ltd)
SECOND RESPONDENT Christopher Ian Gribble PARTIES : THIRD RESPONDENT Jo-Ann Schlein
FOURTH RESPONDENT John Picardi
FIFTH RESPONDENT Verso Technologies Inc. (Formerly Eltrax Systems Inc.) FILE NUMBER: IRC 4276 of 2001 CORAM: Boland J Unfair contract - Interlocutory proceedings - Notice of motion - Applicant seeking leave to file amended summons for relief under s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996 and leave to serve summons for relief and amended summons for relief on Fifth respondent - No appearance by Fifth respondent and no notice of motion filed by Fifth respondent pursuant to r82(1) of Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 - Submissions opposing leave to serve Fifth respondent put by first to fourth respondents - Minor amendments only to summons - No prejudice to respondents - Leave granted to file amended summons - Lengthy delay in serving Fifth respondent - Whether applicant estopped from seeking leave to now serve Fifth respondent - Whether adequate reason for lengthy delay - Fifth respondent a foreign corporation - Whether contract in and of New South Wales - Whether contract is one whereby work is performed in any industry - Whether any judgment entered against Fifth respondent would be enforceable - Leave granted to serve summonses on Fifth respondent CATCHWORDS : Practice and procedure - Unfair contract - Interlocutory proceedings - Notice of motion - Applicant seeking leave to file amended summons for relief under s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996 and leave to serve summons for relief and amended summons for relief on Fifth respondent - No appearance by Fifth respondent and no notice of motion filed by Fifth respondent pursuant to r82(1) of Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 - Submissions opposing leave to serve Fifth respondent put by first to fourth respondents - Minor amendments only to summons - No prejudice to respondents - Leave granted to file amended summons - Lengthy delay in serving Fifth respondent - Whether applicant estopped from seeking leave to now serve Fifth respondent - Whether adequate reason for lengthy delay - Fifth respondent a foreign corporation - Whether contract in and of New South Wales - Whether contract is one whereby work is performed in any industry - Whether any judgment entered against Fifth respondent would be enforceable - Leave granted to serve summonses on Fifth respondent Foreign Judgments Act 1973 (Cth) Foreign Judgments Regulations 1992 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996 r 82 r 88 r 108 Supreme Court Rules 1970 r 7(1) Bell v Macquarie Bank (No 4) (1999) 93 IR 191 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Chrysler Jeep v Canberra Star Motors (1997) 79 IR 452 Clough & Rogers v Frog (1974) 4 ALR 615 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Mehta (1991) 23 NSWLR 84 Darc Rasmussen v Eltrax Systems Pty Ltd (Formerly Sulcus (Australia) Pty Ltd) and others [2003] NSWIRComm 157 Delaney v Fujian Pacific Pty Ltd [1999] NSWIRComm 56 Franklin House v ANI Corporation (unreported, SCNSW, Windeyer J, 7 November 1994) Gough & Gilmour v Caterpillar Australia (No 5) [2001] NSWIRComm 112 CASES CITED : Harding v Bourke (2000) 48 NSWLR 598 Mayne Nickless Ltd v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW & Ors [2004] NSWCA 359 McRann v UnitedGlobalcom Inc and ors [2003] NSWIRComm 131 Mitchforce v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW (2003) 57 NSWLR 212 Reich v Client Server Professionals of Australia Pty Limited (2000) 49 NSWLR 551 Solution 6 Holdings Limited & Ors v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW & Ors [2004] NSWCA 200 Solution 6 Holdings v IRC of NSW [2004] NSWCA 200 Sydney Water Corporation Ltd & Anor v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW & Ors (CA 40666/04) Verso Technologies Inc (formerly Eltrax Systems Inc) v Rasmussen and Ors (No 2) [2004] NSWIRComm 234 Verso Technologies Inc. (formerly Eltrax Systems Inc) v Rasmussen [2004 NSWIRComm 90 Western Sydney Area Health Service v Gibson (2001) 109 IR 359 HEARING DATES: 09/22/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/15/2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate