NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
CITATION : Manildra Flour Mills v Hammond [2004] NSWIRComm 328 APPELLANT Manildra Flour Mills (MFG) Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ronald Hammond FILE NUMBER: IRC 2145 of 2003 CORAM: Wright J President; Walton J Vice-President; Kavanagh J CATCHWORDS : Appeal - Unfair contract - Application for leave to appeal - Alleged denial of natural justice - Whether adequate reasons for decision given - Principles as to making of consequential orders - Consequential relief - Interest on verdict - Leave to appeal refused - Appeal dismissed - Costs. CASES CITED : Hammond v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd [2003] NSWIRComm 64 King v State Bank of New South Wales (No 2) (2003) 126 IR 407 HEARING DATES: 10/27/2004 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10/27/2004
APPELLANT Mr A R Moses of counsel Solicitors: Phillips Fox LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr S J Burchett of counsel Solicitors: R L Whyburn & Associates
JUDGMENT:
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN COURT SESSION FULL BENCH
CORAM: WRIGHT J, President WALTON J, Vice-President KAVANAGH J
Wednesday 27 October 2004
Matter No IRC 2145 of 2003 MANILDRA FLOUR MILLS (MFG) PTY LIMITED v RONALD HAMMOND
Application by Manildra Flour Mills (MFG) Pty Limited for leave to appeal and appeal against a decision of Justice Marks given on 31 March 2003 in Matter No IRC 6288 of 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate