NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session
Harry Day v John Smidmore and others [2005] NSWIRComm 320 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPELLANT Harry Mark Day
FIRST RESPONDENT John Michael Smidmore PARTIES: SECOND RESPONDENT Christopher Ronald Michael
THIRD RESPONDENT Adolphi Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 7172 of 2004
CORAM: Walton J Vice-President; Boland J; Backman J
Appeal - Unfair contract - Summons for relief under s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996 permanently stayed on the grounds the applicant/appellant by his conduct had compromised the prospects for a fair trial - Consideration of the tests to be applied in permanently staying proceeding for abuse of process - Effect of applicant/appellant's conduct on respondents, respondents' legal representatives and respondents witnesses - Notice of contention contending judge at first instance erred in not upholding respondent's motion on other grounds put at first instance - Applicant/appellant's conduct described as disgraceful - Applicant/appellant's conduct not such as to give rise to an unacceptable risk of injustice - Leave to appeal granted - Appeal upheld - Proceedings remitted for trial CATCHWORDS: Practice and Procedure - Appeal - Unfair contract - Summons for relief under s 106 of Industrial Relations Act 1996 permanently stayed on the grounds the applicant/appellant by his conduct had compromised the prospects for a fair trial - Consideration of the tests to be applied in permanently staying proceeding for abuse of process - Effect of applicant/appellant's conduct on respondents, respondent's legal representatives and respondents witnesses - Notice of contention contending judge at first instance erred in not upholding respondent's motion on other grounds put at first instance - Applicant/appellant's conduct described as disgraceful - Applicant/appellant's conduct not such as to give rise to an unacceptable risk of injustice - Leave to appeal granted - Appeal upheld - Proceedings remitted for trial
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate