NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION: Transport Workers' Union of NSW and Chubb Security Services Ltd and Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd [2005] NSWIRComm 369
Applicant: Transport Workers Union of New South Wales
First Respondent: PARTIES: Chubb Security Services Ltd
Second Respondent: Linfox Armaguard Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 406 and 407 of 2004
CORAM: Wright J President; Kavanagh J; Connor C
CATCHWORDS: Industrial dispute - Strike pay - Transport Industry - Cash in Transit operations - Interpretation of s 143 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - Legislative intent - Purpose of statutory scheme - History of disputes - Circumstances in existence at time relevant to applications - Examination of factual circumstances - Discretionary considerations - Orders made in part.
Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 130 s 143 s 193 LEGISLATION CITED: Interpretation Act 1987 s 9 s 33
Alstom Power v AWU [2000] NSWIRComm 180 AFMEPKIU v Caltex Australia Ltd (unreported, Connor C, 14 November 2002) AMIEU v Australia Meat Holdings [1996] NSWIRComm 22 ASMOF (NSW) v CSAHS [2005] NSWIRComm 339 AWU v BHP Steel [2001] NSWIRComm 1050 CASES CITED: ETU v John Goss Projects [1996] NSWIRComm 39 Labor Council of NSW v Axis Metal Roofing (2004) 131 IR 272 Labor Council of NSW v Bechtel Australia Pty Ltd (unreported, Murphy C, 28 September 2001) Mills v Meeking (1990) 169 CLR 214 NSW Teachers Federation v TAFE Commission [1997] NSWIRComm 115 TWU v Kwikasair Express (unreported, McKenna CC, 2 August 1994)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate