NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION : Kagan v Primus Telecommunications (Aust) Pty Ltd [2000] NSWIRComm 101 APPLICANT Ronald Kagan PARTIES : RESPONDENT Primus Telecommunications (Aust) Pty Limited FILE NUMBER: IRC 2279 of 2000 CORAM: Hungerford J CATCHWORDS : Extension of Time - Application to extend time to appeal - Principles to apply - Process filed 5 days late - Reasons for delay weak - Nature of issue raised by proposed appeal - Meaning of word "remuneration" - Well arguable case - Balance of parties' competing interests - Operation of unfair dismissal scheme - Interests of justice - Extension of time granted - Appeal process competent. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 83(1)(b) s 84 s 189 Skelly v Prouds Jewellers Pty Ltd [1994] 53 IR 3 CASES CITED : Brady v Kennedy t/as "Sardines" (1999) 91 IR 258 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Salmon) v Parkes Council (1996) 70 IR 298 Van Rooy Machinery Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Wolf) [2000] NSWIRComm 48 HEARING DATES: 06/02/2000; 06/08/2000 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 06/08/2000
APPLICANT Mr J J de Meyrick of counsel SOLICITORS Lakos & Company LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr B K B Cross of counsel SOLICITORS Middletons Moore & Bevins
JUDGMENT: - 10 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate