NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION : Peter Payam Far and Brian Manning Dodd & Stephen John Dodd t/as Rishworth Dodd & Co, Solicitors [2002] NSWIRComm 181 APPLICANT: Peter Payam Far PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Brian Manning Dodd & Stephen John Dodd t/as Rishworth Dodd & Co, Solicitors FILE NUMBER: 3576 of 2002 CORAM: Sams DP Termination of employment - Unfair dismissal - conduct of proceedings - Industrial Relations Commission Rules - Rule 146 - failure to attend proceedings - want of prosecution - balance of justice - principles considered CATCHWORDS : Held, no explanation for non attendance on two occasions - application not pursued with due diligence - inconvenience and cost for respondent - balance of justice favours respondent - Rule 146 - application dismissed for want of prosecution LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 CASES CITED : Hutchison and Karl Azzi Hairstylists [2002] NSWIRComm 133 Lin v Roseville Golf Club Limited [2002] NSWIRComm 81 HEARING DATES: 07/16/2002; 07/19/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/02/2002
APPLICANT: No appearance LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr B Dodd (Solicitor)
JUDGMENT: - 4 - INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CORAM: SAMS DP 2 August 2002
Matter No IRC02/3576
PETER PAYAM FAR AND BRIAN MANNING DODD & STEPHEN JOHN DODD T/AS RISHWORTH DODD & CO, SOLICITORS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate