NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
CITATION : New South Wales Teachers' Federation and New South Wales Department of Education and Training [2000] NSWIRComm 169 revised - 06/09/2000 APPLICANT New South Wales Teachers' Federation PARTIES : RESPONDENT New South Wales Department of Eduation and Training FILE NUMBER: IRC 6326 of 1999 CORAM: Wright J President; Walton J Vice-President; Connor C Industrial dispute - Direction made under s 134(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - Application for leave to appeal - Alleged factual errors and denial of natural justice - Limited role and nature of s 134(2) of the Industrial Relations Act - Leave to appeal refused. CATCHWORDS : Appeal - Application for leave to appeal - Direction made under s 134(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - Discretionary decision - Approach to be applied - Comparable situation to appeal from interlocutory decision - No relevant error demonstrated - Criterion for leave to appeal in s 188 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 not satisfied - Leave to appeal refused. LEGISLATION CITED : Industrial Relations Act 1996 s 3 s 134 s 135 s 188 s 191 Asahi Diamond Industrial Australia Pty Limited v Automotive Food Metals and Engineering Union (1995) 59 IR 385 CASES CITED : Caltex Petroleum Pty Limited (1999) 92 IR 264 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 HEARING DATES: 11/30/1999 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/31/2000
APPELLANT Mr S Crawshaw SC New South Wales Teachers Federation
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate