NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Sutherland Shire Council v Australian Natural Food Holdings Pty Limited & Anor. [2001] NSWLEC 189 APPLICANT: Sutherland Shire Council PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: Australian Natural Food Holdings Pty Limited & Anor. FILE NUMBER(S) : 40078 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Injunctions and Declarations :- Injunctions - enforcement of breach of planning law - Respondent obtains development consent and modification approval rendering use complained of no longer unlawful - Court accepts Respondent undertaking to comply with new planning consent regime-Proceedings dismissed-costs order (partial) in favour of Council. LEGISLATION CITED: CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 27/11/00-29/11/00, 04/12/00, 07/02/01, 02/05/01, 13/06/01 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 06/13/2001
APPLICANT: Mr N Newport, Barrister SOLICITORS Abbott Tout LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr M Craig QC SOLICITORS Cutler Hughes and Harris
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 40078 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram: Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 13 June 2001
SUTHERLAND SHIRE COUNCIL
Applicant
v
AUSTRALIAN NATURAL FOOD HOLDINGS PTY LTD & ANOR.
Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bignold J:
1. These Class 4 proceedings were, by consent, heard together with two related Class 1 proceedings, it being common ground that if the related Class 1 proceedings (Nos 10967 and 10868 of 2000) ultimately be successful (and the company thereby obtain (i) modification of its existing development consent; and (ii) further development consent for use of another building within the industrial complex) the activities, the subject of complaint and enforcement action in the Class 4 proceedings would no longer be in breach of relevant planning laws.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate