NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Warringah Council v Ulrich [2001] NSWLEC 120 APPLICANT: Warringah Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Ulrich FILE NUMBER(S) : 40105 of 1998 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Orders :- compliance by council following individual default LEGISLATION CITED: CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 24/07/2000 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 07/24/2000
APPLICANT: Mr A M Hudson (Solicitor) SOLICITORS: Wilshire Webb LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: In person SOLICITORS: N/A
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 40105 of 1998 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 24 July, 2000
Warringah Council Applicant v Joachim Ulrich Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. HIS HONOUR: Mr Ulrich, I have listened carefully to what you have put to the Court today. I accept that you believe that you have made what you would consider to be a reasonable and fair effort to comply with the Court's orders made on 25 October 1999.
2. I accept also that you harbour some concern that an understanding was reached on an earlier occasion when these issues were before the Magistrate's Court. Your understanding, following orders made in those proceedings, was that you were entitled to continue using part of your land, as defined in those orders, for the purposes which are now the subject of the complaint in these proceedings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate