NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Collins v Fast-Link Communications Brokers and anor [2007] NSWIRComm 49 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
Applicant Michelle Collins
PARTIES: First respondent Fast-Link Communications Brokers Pty Ltd
Second respondent Edwin Almeida
FILE NUMBER(S): IRC 2038 of 2003
CORAM: Backman J
CATCHWORDS: Unfair contract - s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 - no appearance by applicant or for or on behalf of the applicant or by respondents - first respondent de-registered, second respondent unable to be located - applicant's solicitor aware of directions hearing because personally informed of time and date some days beforehand - Court attempts to contact the applicant's solicitor following the non-attendance prove unsuccessful - matter adjourned for 7 days for appropriate explanation for non-attendance by applicant's solicitor - if no appropriate explanation or non-attendance, proceedings to be dismissed under Rule 146(a) of the Industrial Relations Commission Rules - direction that transcript of judgment be forwarded forthwith to applicant and applicant's solicitor on the record.
LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996
HEARING DATES: 07/03/2007 EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 7 March 2007
Applicant: No appearance LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: First and second respondent: No appearance
JUDGMENT:
- 1 - INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate