NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 119 LGERA 384 APPEAL PARTLY DISMISSED
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Armstrong and Anor v Ashfield Municipal Council [2001] NSWLEC 277 APPLICANTS: Leonard Armstrong Christina Armstrong PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Ashfield Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40184 of 2001 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Existing Use Rights :- inference to be drawn from historical records - effect of consent to continuation of use under cl 34 of the County of Cumberland Planning Scheme Ordinance - categorisation of use. Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 106, s 106(b)(i), s 109B Local Government Act 1919 s 341, s 342 AS LEGISLATION CITED: Ashfield Local Environment Plan 1985 County of Cumberland Planning Scheme Ordinance cl 24, cl 34, cl 34(1), cl 34(2) Ordinance No. 105 Town and Country Planning - General Interim Development North Sydney Municipal Council v Boyts Radio and Electrical Pty Ltd and Others (1989) 67 LGRA 344; Royal Agricultural Society of New South Wales v Sydney City Council (1987) 61 LGRA 305; CASES CITED: Shire of Perth v O'Keefe and Another (1964) 110 CLR 529; South Sydney City Council v M. & D. Cooper (Bignold J, NSWLEC, 28 May 1997, unreported); Woollahra Municipal Council v Banool Developments Pty Limited (1973) 129 CLR 138; Woollahra Municipal Council v Hinton (1967) 13 LGRA 417 DATES OF HEARING: 29/10/2001, 20/11/2001 (final written submissions) DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/07/2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate