NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Andari-Diakanastasi v Rockdale City Council [2000] NSWLEC 250 APPLICANT: Maryanna Andari-Diakanastasi PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Rockdale City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10152 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- whether amendment amounts to a new application LEGISLATION CITED: Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd & Anor v Parkes Developments Pty Ltd [1974] 2 NSWLR 590; CASES CITED: Cornale v Hornsby Shire Council [1999] NSWLEC 228; IDA Safe Constructions Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (1981) 48 LGRA 62 DATES OF HEARING: 24/10/2000 EX TEMPORE 10/24/2000 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT: Mr J L Burrell (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS: John Burrell Solicitors LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Ms J E Hewitt (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS: Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 10152 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 24 October, 2000
Maryanna Andari-Diakanastasi Applicant v Rockdale City Council Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. In March 1998 the applicant lodged with the respondent council a set of plans in support of an application for development consent to a dual occupancy development. The proposed building has a frontage to O'Neill Street, Brighton-Le-Sands along its widest part and a narrower frontage to Crawford Road.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate