NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2000) 110 LGERA 345
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Perry Properties Pty Ltd v Ashfield Municipal Council [2000] NSWLEC 188 APPLICANT Perry Properties Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ashfield Municipal Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10513A of 1999 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: Section 56A Appeal :- Brothel - finding of widespread adverse community reaction to the development resulting in great offence - offence based upon fear of inappropriate behaviour of sex workers and patrons - factual finding that there was no basis for such concern - adverse community reaction based upon unsubstantiated fear - fear without basis insufficient to constitute social impact - error of law - appeal upheld LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Croucher v Fairfield City Council (1997) NSWLEC 88; Fairfield City Council v Liu NSWCA no 40043 of 1998; Hope v Bathurst City Council (1980) 144 CLR 1; Kulin Holdings Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [1999] NSWLEC 157; CASES CITED: Liu v Fairfield City Council No 10384 of 1996; NSWLEC 272; McDonald Industries Limited v Sydney City Council (1979-81) 43 LGRA 428 ; Randwick Municipal Council v Manousaki (1988) 66 LGRA 330 (CA) ; Rendell v Release on Licence Board (1987) 10 NSWLR 499 ; The Australian Gas Light Co v The Valuer General (1940) 40 SR 126; Venus Enterprises Pty Limited v Parramatta City Council (1981) 43 LGRA 67 DATES OF HEARING: 11/08/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/21/2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate