NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 101 LGERA 435
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Upton -V- Yarrowlumla Shire Council [1999] NSWLEC 43
PARTIES APPLICANT: Harold Upton
RESPONDENT: Yarrowlumla Shire Council
NUMBER: 10708 and 10709 of 1998
CORAM: Bignold J
KEY ISSUES: :- "Home industry" and "home office permissible categories of development under LEP-meaning of terms-whether proposed developments fulfil spatial conditions of defined terms HELD: Proposed developments for permissible purposes
LEGISLATION CITED: "Home industry" and "home office permissible categories of development under LEP-meaning of terms-whether proposed developments fulfil spatial conditions of defined terms HELD: Proposed developments for permissible purposes
DATES OF HEARING: 03/01/1999; 03/02/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 03/03/1999
APPLICANT: Mr T. Robertson, Barrister
Solicitors: Wolf & Associates LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr A.Bradbury, Solicitor
Solicitors: Deacons Graham and James
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate