NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Urbis Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2001] NSWLEC 147 APPLICANT: Urbis Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Sutherland Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10774 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Practice & Procedure :- Amended plans - whether they may be treated as an amendment of the development application - leave granted on terms Construction & Interpretation :- Whether new plans are amended plans for the purpose of cl 55 Environmental and Planning Assessment Regulation 2000 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation - cl 55 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Ervin Mahrer and Partners v Strathfield Municipal Council [No 2] [2001] NSWLEC 140, unreported; R v Shanahan & Ors; Ex Parte Northern Territory Planning Authority (1984) 54 LGRA 255; CASES CITED: Ross Karp & Associates Pty Limited v Randwick City Council (1999) 106 LGERA 397; Toadolla Company Pty Ltd v Dumaresq Shire Council [1992] NSWLEC 129; Willoughby Municipal Council v Manchil Pty Limited (1974) 29 LGRA 303 DATES OF HEARING: 5 July 2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/11/2001
APPLICANT: Mr C W McEwen (Barrister) SOLICITORS Mallesons Stephen Jaques LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Ms S A Duggan (Barrister) SOLICITORS Sutherland Shire Council
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate