NSW Caselaw
Industrial Court of New South Wales
CITATION: Hosanna Holdings Pty Limited and ors v Peter Henry Oey and ors [2007] NSWIRComm 218
FIRST APPLICANT: Hosanna Holdings Pty Limited
SECOND APPLICANT: Jeffrey Samuel Ramdoo
THIRD APPLICANT: Renee Ramdoo
PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT: Peter Henry Oey
SECOND RESPONDENT: Charis International Pty Limited
THIRD RESPONDENT: OCorp Consulting Pty Limited
FOURTH RESPONDENT: Rowland Jones
FILE NUMBER(S): 3100 of 2005
CORAM: Marks J
CATCHWORDS: S106 proceedings - unfair franchise agreement - ex parte hearing - contract is of the relevant kind as described in s106(1) - two aspects of franchise agreement which created relevant unfairness - misrepresentations resulting in that which applicant acquired being different and less valuable than what was contemplated - respondent's failure to implement franchise agreement made it difficult for applicant to succeed in operating the business - franchise agreement avoided from inception - franchisee entitled to refund of monies paid and compensation for trading loss
Industrial Relations Act 1996 s105, 106 LEGISLATION CITED: Legal Profession Act 2004 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Schedule 5
Brown v Rezitis (1970) 127 CLR 157 CASES CITED: Mayne Nickless Ltd v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW & 3 ors [2004] NSWCA 359 McDonald's Australia Holdings Limited v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW [2005] NSWCA 286
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate