NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Cornale v Hornsby Shire Council [1999] NSWLEC 228
PARTIES APPLICANT: Cornale
RESPONDENT: Hornsby Shire Council
NUMBER: 10391 of 1997
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: Development :- whether amendment or new development - whether amendment amounts to fresh development application
LEGISLATION CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 06/05/1998
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 06/05/1998
APPLICANT: Mr G Newport (Barrister)
SOLICITORS: Robert Napoli & Co LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr R Graham (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS: Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 10391 of 1997 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 5 June 1998
Nereo Christian Cornale Applicant v Hornsby Shire Council Respondent
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT ON APPLICATION BY WAY OF NOTICE OF MOTION FOR AN ORDER THAT THE APPEAL BASED UPON AMENDED PLANS NOW BEFORE THE COURT BE STRUCK OUT.
1. HIS HONOUR: The original plans lodged in support of a development application by the applicant in these proceedings, the respondent to the notice of motion, showed the proposed development of four dwellings at Lot 37, 7 Loch Maree Avenue, Thornleigh.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate