NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 112 LGERA 107
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Canterbury City Council v Saad [2000] NSWLEC 278 PROSECUTOR: Canterbury City Council PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Saad FILE NUMBER(S) : 50022 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Environmental Offences :- carrying out development in contravention of condition of development consent—essential elements of the offence. LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 125, s 76A(1) CASES CITED: Environment Protection Authority v Bathurst City Council (1995) 89 LGERA 79; Rao v Canterbury City Council (2000) NSWCCA 471 DATES OF HEARING: 6/10/00, 23/10/00 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/22/2000
PROSECUTOR: Mr A Hawkes, Solicitor SOLICITORS Pike Pike and Fenwick LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT: Mr T Howard, Barrister SOLICITORS Legs Lawyers
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND Matter No . 50022 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF Coram : Bignold J. NEW SOUTH WALES 22 December 2000
CANTERBURY CITY COUNCIL
Prosecutor
v
SAYED SAAD
Defendant
JUDGMENT
Bignold J:
A. INTRODUCTION
1. The Defendant has pleaded not guilty to a charge of an offence against s 125 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the EP&A Act) in that "on or about 23 December 1999 (he) did implement development consent No 589/98 for the demolition of two dwellings and construction of 7x 3 bedroom townhouses at 2-4 Broadway, Punchbowl contrary to condition 40 of the said consent".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate