NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Byron Shire Council v Vaughan & Anor [No. 3] [2001] NSWLEC 102 APPLICANT: Byron Shire Council PARTIES : RESPONDENTS: John Bernard Vaughan and Anne Vaughan FILE NUMBER(S) : 30164 of 1997 CORAM: Lloyd J KEY ISSUES: Estoppel :- appropriate form of relief Costs: - apportionment of costs - unsuccessful applicant successful on some issues - issues not severable LEGISLATION CITED: Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 s 2, s 14 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 22, s 69 Australian Trade Commission v Disktravel [2000] FCA 62; Byron Shire Council v Vaughan & Anor, NSWLEC, Lloyd J, 14 July 1998, unreported; Byron Shire Council v Vaughan & Anor [No. 2] (2000) 110 LGERA 425; Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4; CASES CITED: Droga v Proprietors of Strata Plan 51722, NSWLEC, Bignold J, 28 July 1997, unreported; Grundt v Great Boulder Propriety Goldmines Ltd (1937) 59 CLR 641; McKinnon v Hallbridge Pty Ltd, NSWLEC, Sheahan J, 10 July 1998, unreported; Hofer v Howell Developments Pty Ltd [2001] NSWLEC 42; Milne v Attorney-General (Tas) (1956) 95 CLR 460 ; Vaughan v Byron Shire Council (1999) 103 LGERA 321 DATES OF HEARING: 21/03/2001 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/30/2001
APPLICANT: Mr J L B Allsop SC and Ms L M Byrne (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Elliot & Sochacki LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS: Mr S D Rares SC and Ms R Sofroniou (Barrister) SOLICITORS: Walters
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate