NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales CITATION: Martin & Spork Pty Ltd v South Sydney City Council [1999] NSWLEC 73
PARTIES APPLICANT Martin & Spork Pty Ltd
RESPONDENT South Sydney City Council
NUMBER: 10606 of 1998
CORAM: Pearlman J
KEY ISSUES: Section 56A Appeal :- duty to give reasons
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A
DATES OF HEARING: 04/21/1999
DATE OF JUDGMENT DELIVERY: 07/02/1999
APPLICANT Mr W R Davison SC
SOLICITORS Clinch Neville Long LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P J McEwen SC
SOLICITORS Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND 10606 of 1998 ENVIRONMENT COURT Pearlman J OF NEW SOUTH WALES 2 July 1999
MARTIN & SPORK PTY LTD Applicant v SOUTH SYDNEY CITY COUNCIL Respondent JUDGMENT
Introduction
1. This is an appeal from the decision of the Senior Commissioner granting development consent subject to conditions in respect of a development proposed for Nos. 196 - 214 William Street, Woolloomooloo ("the site").
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate